Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2008-03-13
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
12 pages, 3 figures
Scientific paper
We consider the perihelion precession and bending of light in a class of Kaluza-Klein models and show that the "electric redshift" model, proposed in Zhang (2006) to explain the redshift of Quasars, does not agree with observations. As Zhang's model only considers the Jordan frame, we also compute the perihelion precession as seen in the Einstein frame and show that, to lowest order, the perihelion precession can only be consistent with observation in the Einstein frame. However, when we consider the corresponding "electric redshift" in the Einstein frame, we find that the redshift is significantly lower than for the Jordan frame and is therefore very unlikely to explain the redshift of quasars.
Elgaroy Oystein
Gron Oyvind
Hervik Sigbjorn
No associations
LandOfFree
Perihelion precession in spherically symmetric Kaluza-Klein theories does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Perihelion precession in spherically symmetric Kaluza-Klein theories, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Perihelion precession in spherically symmetric Kaluza-Klein theories will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-69952