Biology – Quantitative Biology – Populations and Evolution
Scientific paper
2007-06-09
Biology
Quantitative Biology
Populations and Evolution
A one-page note. For the supplementary information for this note, including the cited Reply and Errata, see math-ph/0608014
Scientific paper
Lieberman and Melott built their recent arXiv preprint 0704.2896 on my published paper and (a preprint of) a subsequent comment by Liebermans associate Cornette. But had this group waited for the Cornette comment to actually appear in print together with the expected Reply, they would have learned that his comment exposes Cornettes confusion that likely was due to journal misprint of my figure. Thus 0704.2896 is baseless. Despite receiving the extended Reply with Errata, these authors still fail to recognize that detrending of paleontological records-which they erroneously promote as a must-is an arbitrary rather than a universal operation.
No associations
LandOfFree
Note on: Considering the Case for Biodiversity Cycles: Reexamining the Evidence for Periodicity in the Fossil Record, by Lieberman and Melott, arXiv preprint 0704.2896 does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Note on: Considering the Case for Biodiversity Cycles: Reexamining the Evidence for Periodicity in the Fossil Record, by Lieberman and Melott, arXiv preprint 0704.2896, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Note on: Considering the Case for Biodiversity Cycles: Reexamining the Evidence for Periodicity in the Fossil Record, by Lieberman and Melott, arXiv preprint 0704.2896 will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-677532