A Comparison of Three Elliptical Galaxy Photo-chemical Evolution Codes

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

30 pages, LaTeX, 3 figures available from http://msowww.anu.edu.au/~gibson/publications.html, to be published in Sept 1996 A

Scientific paper

10.1086/177678

Working within the classic supernovae-driven wind framework for elliptical galaxy evolution, we perform a systematic investigation into the discrepancies between the predictions of three contemporary codes -- Arimoto & Yoshii (1987, A&A, 173, 23), Bressan et al. (1994, ApJS, 94, 63), and Gibson (1996a, MNRAS, 278, 829; 1996b, MNRAS, submitted). By being primarily concerned with reproducing the present-day colour-metallicity-luminosity (CML) relations amongst ellipticals, the approaches taken in the theoretical modelling have managed to obscure many of the hidden differences between the codes. Targeting the timescale for the onset of the initial galactic wind t_GW as a primary ``difference'' indicator, we demonstrate exactly how and why each code is able to claim successful reproduction of the CML relations, despite possessing apparently incompatible input ingredients.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Comparison of Three Elliptical Galaxy Photo-chemical Evolution Codes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Comparison of Three Elliptical Galaxy Photo-chemical Evolution Codes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Comparison of Three Elliptical Galaxy Photo-chemical Evolution Codes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-667788

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.