Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2007-12-12
Astron.Nachr.328:1087-1091,2007
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
5 pages, 2 figures
Scientific paper
10.1002/asna.200710836
Various methods (or recipes) have been proposed to predict future solar activity levels - with mixed success. Among these, some precursor methods based upon quantities determined around or a few years before solar minimum have provided rather high correlations with the strength of the following cycles. Recently, data assimilation with an advection-dominated (flux-transport) dynamo model has been proposed as a predictive tool, yielding remarkably high correlation coefficients. After discussing the potential implications of these results and the criticism that has been raised, we study the possible physical origin(s) of the predictive skill provided by precursor and other methods. It is found that the combination of the overlap of solar cycles and their amplitude-dependent rise time (Waldmeier's rule) introduces correlations in the sunspot number (or area) record, which account for the predictive skill of many precursor methods. This explanation requires no direct physical relation between the precursor quantity and the dynamo mechanism (in the sense of the Babcock-Leighton scheme or otherwise).
No associations
LandOfFree
Are solar cycles predictable? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Are solar cycles predictable?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Are solar cycles predictable? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-661389