Testing Hydrodynamic Models of LMC X-4 with UV and X-ray Spectra

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

11 figures, accepted by ApJ

Scientific paper

10.1086/319773

We compare the predictions of hydrodynamic models of the LMC X-4 X-ray binary system with observations of UV P Cygni lines with the GHRS and STIS spectrographs on the Hubble Space Telescope. The hydrodynamic model determines density and velocity fields of the stellar wind, wind-compressed disk, accretion stream, Keplerian accretion disk, and accretion disk wind. We use a Monte Carlo code to determine the UV P Cygni line profiles by simulating the radiative transfer of UV photons that originate on the star and are scattered in the wind. The qualitative orbital variation predicted is similar to that observed, although the model fails to reproduce the strong orbital asymmetry (the observed absorption is strongest for phi>0.5). The model predicts a mid-eclipse X-ray spectrum, due almost entirely to Compton scattering, with a factor 4 less flux than observed with ASCA. We discuss how the model may need to be altered to explain the spectral variability of the system.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Testing Hydrodynamic Models of LMC X-4 with UV and X-ray Spectra does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Testing Hydrodynamic Models of LMC X-4 with UV and X-ray Spectra, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Testing Hydrodynamic Models of LMC X-4 with UV and X-ray Spectra will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-655635

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.