Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2001-07-17
Gen.Rel.Grav. 34 (2002) 119-130
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
11 pages, no figures; a criticism of astro-ph/0009020; Gen. Rel. Grav., accepted for publication
Scientific paper
A recent criticism of cosmological methodology and achievements by Disney (2000) is assessed. Some historical and epistemological fallacies in the said article have been highlighted. It is shown that---both empirically and epistemologically---modern cosmology lies on sounder foundations than it is portrayed. A brief historical account demonstrates that this form of unsatisfaction with cosmology has had a long tradition, and rather meagre results in the course of the XX century.
No associations
LandOfFree
Laudatores Temporis Acti, or Why Cosmology is Alive and Well - A Reply to Disney does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Laudatores Temporis Acti, or Why Cosmology is Alive and Well - A Reply to Disney, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Laudatores Temporis Acti, or Why Cosmology is Alive and Well - A Reply to Disney will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-641971