Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2002-04-24
Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc. 339 (2003) 881
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
6 pages, 5 figures, MNRAS in press; extended conclusions and discussion
Scientific paper
10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06242.x
In models for gamma ray burst afterglows, it is normally assumed that the external shock strongly amplifies the magnetic field and that this field maintains a steady value throughout the shocked region. We discuss the effects of modifying this (probably simplistic) assumption by allowing for a short decay time. The observations are incompatible with a post-shock field that decays too rapidly. However if the field pervades only a few percent of the total thickness of the shocked shell (and the electrons undergo only inverse Compton losses in the remainder) the model could be compatible with data. This would suggest a strong dependence of model parameters on the uncertainties of shock physics, therefore calling for independent external density estimates. We claim that afterglow emission should be instead seen as a laboratory where we can understand relativistic shock physics. The model we propose here together with afterglow observations in all wavebands could help to pin down the field structure.
Rees Martin J.
Rossi Elena
No associations
LandOfFree
Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow emission with a decaying magnetic field does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow emission with a decaying magnetic field, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglow emission with a decaying magnetic field will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-640