Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2004-09-15
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
13 pages, 1 figure, accepted for publication in ApJ
Scientific paper
10.1086/432567
We show that simple kinematic arguments can give limits on the timescale and amplitude of variabilities in gamma-ray burst (GRB) afterglows, especially when the variability timescale is shorter than the observed time since the burst \Delta t < t. These limits help us to identify the sources of afterglow variability. The afterglows of GRB 011211 and GRB 021004 marginally violate these limits. If such violation is confirmed by the Swift satellite, a possible explanation is that (1) the compact objects that power GRB jets continue to eject an intermittent outflow for a very long timescale (> 1 day), (2) the GRB jet from the central engine has a temporal anisotropy with a large brightness contrast > 10 and small angular structure < 10^{-2}, or (3) many (> 10^{3}) regions fluctuate simultaneously in the emitting site.
Ioka Kunihito
Kobayashi Shiho
Zhang Bing
No associations
LandOfFree
Variabilities of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Long-acting Engine, Anisotropic Jet or Many Fluctuating Regions? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Variabilities of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Long-acting Engine, Anisotropic Jet or Many Fluctuating Regions?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Variabilities of Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows: Long-acting Engine, Anisotropic Jet or Many Fluctuating Regions? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-620968