Three years Swift-BAT Survey of AGN: reconciling theory and observations?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – High Energy Astrophysical Phenomena

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Accepted for publication by ApJ. Contains 17 figures and 5 tables

Scientific paper

It is well accepted that unabsorbed as well as absorbed AGN are needed to explain the nature and the shape of the Cosmic X-ray background, even if the fraction of highly absorbed objects (dubbed Compton-thick sources) substantially still escapes detection. We derive and analyze the absorption distribution using a complete sample of AGN detected by Swift-BAT in the first three years of the survey. The fraction of Compton-thick AGN represents only 4.6% of the total AGN population detected by Swift-BAT. However, we show that once corrected for the bias against the detection of very absorbed sources the real intrinsic fraction of Compton-thick AGN is 20$^{+9}_{-6}$%. We proved for the first time (also in the BAT band) that the anti-correlation of the fraction of absorbed AGN and luminosity it tightly connected to the different behavior of the luminosity functions (XLFs) of absorbed and unabsorbed AGN. This points towards a difference between the two subsamples of objects with absorbed AGN being, on average, intrinsically less luminous than unobscured ones. Moreover the XLFs show that the fraction of obscured AGN might also decrease at very low luminosity. This can be successfully interpreted in the framework of a disk cloud outflow scenario as the disappearance of the obscuring region below a critical luminosity. Our results are discussed in the framework of population synthesis models and the origin of the Cosmic X-ray Background.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Three years Swift-BAT Survey of AGN: reconciling theory and observations? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Three years Swift-BAT Survey of AGN: reconciling theory and observations?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Three years Swift-BAT Survey of AGN: reconciling theory and observations? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-602326

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.