Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2002-02-11
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
34 pages, 11 figures, accepted by Astronomy and Astrophysics
Scientific paper
10.1051/0004-6361:20020248
We start by studying a small set of objects characterized by photometric profiles that have been pointed out to deviate significantly from the standard R^{1/4} law. For these objects we confirm that a generic R^{1/n} law, with n a free parameter, can provide superior fits (the best-fit value of n can be lower than 2.5 or higher than 10), better than those that can be obtained by a pure R^{1/4} law, by an R^{1/4}+exponential model, and by other dynamically justified self--consistent models. Therefore, strictly speaking, elliptical galaxies should not be considered homologous dynamical systems. Still, a case for "weak homology", useful for the interpretation of the Fundamental Plane of elliptical galaxies, could be made if the best-fit parameter n, as often reported, correlates with galaxy luminosity L, provided the underlying dynamical structure also follows a systematic trend with luminosity. We demonstrate that this statement may be true even in the presence of significant scatter in the correlation n(L). Preliminary indications provided by a set of "data points" associated with a sample of 14 galaxies suggest that neither the strict homology nor the constant stellar mass--to--light solution are a satisfactory explanation of the observed Fundamental Plane (abridged).
Bertin Giuseppe
Ciotti Luca
Del Principe M.
No associations
LandOfFree
Weak homology of elliptical galaxies does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Weak homology of elliptical galaxies, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Weak homology of elliptical galaxies will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-593670