Why Optically--Faint AGN Are Faint: The Spitzer Perspective

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal

Scientific paper

10.1086/430398

Optically--faint X-ray sources (those with f_X/f_R > 10) constitute about 20% of X-ray sources in deep surveys, and are potentially highly obscured and/or at high redshift. Their faint optical fluxes are generally beyond the reach of spectroscopy. For a sample of 20 optically--faint sources in CDFS, we compile 0.4--24 um photometry, relying heavily on Spitzer. We estimate photometric redshifts for 17 of these 20 sources. We find that these AGN are optically--faint both because they lie at significantly higher redshifts (median z ~ 1.6) than most X-ray--selected AGN, and because their spectra are much redder than standard AGN. They have 2--8 keV X-ray luminosities in the Seyfert range, unlike the QSO--luminosities of optically--faint AGN found in shallow, wide--field surveys. Their contribution to the X-ray Seyfert luminosity function is comparable to that of z>1 optically--bright AGN.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Why Optically--Faint AGN Are Faint: The Spitzer Perspective does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Why Optically--Faint AGN Are Faint: The Spitzer Perspective, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Why Optically--Faint AGN Are Faint: The Spitzer Perspective will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-587194

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.