The OPTX Project IV: How Reliable is [OIII] as a Measure of AGN Activity?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Galaxy Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Accepted for publication in the Astrophysical Journal. 11 pages, 10 figures

Scientific paper

We compare optical and hard X-ray identifications of AGNs using a uniformly selected (above a flux limit of f_2-8 keV = 3.5e-15 erg/cm2/s) and highly optically spectroscopically complete ( > 80% for f_2-8 keV > 1e-14 erg/cm2/s and > 60% below) 2-8 keV sample observed in three Chandra fields (CLANS, CLASXS, and the CDF-N). We find that empirical emission-line ratio diagnostic diagrams misidentify 20-50% of the X-ray selected AGNs that can be put on these diagrams as star formers, depending on which division is used. We confirm that there is a large (2 orders in magnitude) dispersion in the log ratio of the [OIII]5007A to hard X-ray luminosities for the non-broad line AGNs, even after applying reddening corrections to the [OIII] luminosities. We find that the dispersion is similar for the broad-line AGNs, where there is not expected to be much X-ray absorption from an obscuring torus around the AGN nor much obscuration from the galaxy along the line-of-sight if the AGN is aligned with the galaxy. We postulate that the X-ray selected AGNs that are misidentified by the diagnostic diagrams have low [OIII] luminosities due to the complexity of the structure of the narrow-line region, which causes many ionizing photons from the AGN not to be absorbed. This would mean that the [OIII] luminosity can only be used to predict the X-ray luminosity to within a factor of ~3 (one sigma). Despite selection effects, we show that the shapes and normalizations of the [OIII] and transformed hard X-ray luminosity functions show reasonable agreement, suggesting that the [OIII] samples are not finding substantially more AGNs at low redshifts than hard X-ray samples.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The OPTX Project IV: How Reliable is [OIII] as a Measure of AGN Activity? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The OPTX Project IV: How Reliable is [OIII] as a Measure of AGN Activity?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The OPTX Project IV: How Reliable is [OIII] as a Measure of AGN Activity? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-582450

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.