New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Accepted for publication in ApJ Letters. Changes according to referee's comments. 11 pages, including 3 tables and 2 figures

Scientific paper

10.1088/0004-637X/705/2/L123

We construct updated solar models with different sets of solar abundances, including the most recent determinations by Asplund et al. (2009). The latter work predicts a larger ($\sim 10%$) solar metallicity compared to previous measurements by the same authors but significantly lower ($\sim 25%$) than the recommended value from a decade ago by Grevesse & Sauval (1998). We compare the results of our models with determinations of the solar structure inferred through helioseismology measurements. The model that uses the most recent solar abundance determinations predicts the base of the solar convective envelope to be located at $R_{\rm CZ}= 0.724{\rm R_\odot}$ and a surface helium mass fraction of $Y_{\rm surf}=0.231$. These results are in conflict with helioseismology data ($R_{\rm CZ}= 0.713\pm0.001{\rm R_\odot}$ and $Y_{\rm surf}=0.2485\pm0.0035$) at 5$-\sigma$ and 11$-\sigma$ levels respectively. Using the new solar abundances, we calculate the magnitude by which radiative opacities should be modified in order to restore agreement with helioseismology. We find that a maximum change of $\sim 15%$ at the base of the convective zone is required with a smooth decrease towards the core, where the change needed is $\sim 5%$. The required change at the base of the convective envelope is about half the value estimated previously. We also present the solar neutrino fluxes predicted by the new models. The most important changes brought about by the new solar abundances are the increase by $\sim 10%$ in the predicted $^{13}$N and $^{15}$O fluxes that arise mostly due to the increase in the C and N abundances in the newly determined solar composition.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-554893

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.