XMM-Newton observations of the brightest Ultraluminous X-ray sources

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

17 pages, 3 figures, accepted for publication in MNRAS

Scientific paper

10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10112.x

We present an analysis of 13 of the best quality EPIC ULX datasets. We utilise the high signal-to-noise in these ULX spectra to investigate the best descriptions of their spectral shape in the 0.3-10 keV range. Simple models of an absorbed power-law or multicolour disc blackbody prove inadequate at describing the spectra. Better fits are found using a combination of these two components, with both variants of this model - a cool (0.2 keV) disc blackbody plus hard power-law continuum, and a soft power-law continuum plus a warm (1.7 keV) disc blackbody - providing good fits to 8/13 ULX spectra. However, by examining the data above 2 keV, we find evidence for curvature in the majority of datasets, inconsistent with the dominance of a power-law in this regime. The most successful empirical description of the spectra proved to be a combination of a cool (0.2 keV) classic blackbody spectrum, plus a warm disc blackbody (good fits to 10/13 ULX spectra). The best overall fits are provided by a physically self-consistent accretion disc plus Comptonised corona model (diskpn + eqpair), which fits acceptably to 11/13 ULXs. This model provides a physical explanation for the spectral curvature, namely that it originates in an optically-thick corona, though the accretion disc photons seeding this corona still originate in an apparently cool disc. We note similarities between this fit and models of Galactic black hole binaries at high accretion rates. We conclude that this analysis of the best spectral data for ULXs shows it to be plausible that the majority of the population are high accretion rate stellar-mass (perhaps up to 80-Msun) black holes, though we cannot categorically rule out the presence of larger, 1000-Msun intermediate-mass black holes (IMBHs) in individual sources with the current X-ray data.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

XMM-Newton observations of the brightest Ultraluminous X-ray sources does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with XMM-Newton observations of the brightest Ultraluminous X-ray sources, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and XMM-Newton observations of the brightest Ultraluminous X-ray sources will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-505965

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.