Mathematics – General Mathematics
Scientific paper
2004-07-30
NeuroQuantology 2004, 2: 1-43; http://www.neuroquantology.com/2004/02/ToC2004_2.htm
Mathematics
General Mathematics
73 pages; this is an updated version of the NQ essay; an HTML version is available at http://alixcomsi.com/Do_Goedel_incomplet
Scientific paper
Classical interpretations of Goedel's formal reasoning imply that the truth of some arithmetical propositions of any formal mathematical language, under any interpretation, is essentially unverifiable. However, a language of general, scientific, discourse cannot allow its mathematical propositions to be interpreted ambiguously. Such a language must, therefore, define mathematical truth verifiably. We consider a constructive interpretation of classical, Tarskian, truth, and of Goedel's reasoning, under which any formal system of Peano Arithmetic is verifiably complete. We show how some paradoxical concepts of Quantum mechanics can be expressed, and interpreted, naturally under a constructive definition of mathematical truth.
No associations
LandOfFree
Do Goedel's incompleteness theorems set absolute limits on the ability of the brain to express and communicate mental concepts verifiably? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Do Goedel's incompleteness theorems set absolute limits on the ability of the brain to express and communicate mental concepts verifiably?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Do Goedel's incompleteness theorems set absolute limits on the ability of the brain to express and communicate mental concepts verifiably? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-504089