Identifying silicate-absorbed ULIRGs at z~1-2 in the Bootes Field using Spitzer/IRS

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Accepted for Publication in Astrophysical Journal Letters 4 pages, 2 figures, 1 table

Scientific paper

10.1086/498645

Using the 16$\mu$m peakup imager on the Infrared Spectrograph (IRS) on Spitzer, we present a serendipitous survey of 0.0392 deg$^{2}$ within the area of the NOAO Deep Wide Field Survey in Bootes. Combining our results with the available Multiband Imaging Photometer for Spitzer (MIPS) 24$\mu$m survey of this area, we produce a catalog of 150 16$\mu$m sources brighter than 0.18 mJy (3$\sigma$) for which we derive measures or limits on the 16/24$\mu$m colors. Such colors are especially useful in determining redshifts for sources whose mid infrared spectra contain strong emission or absorption features that characterize these colors as a function of redshift. We find that the 9.7$\mu$m silicate absorption feature in Ultraluminous Infrared Galaxies (ULIRGs) results in sources brighter at 16$\mu$m than at 24$\mu$m at z $\sim$ 1--1.8 by at least 20%. With a threshold flux ratio of 1.2, restricting our analysis to $>5\sigma$ detections at 16$\mu$m, and using a $3\sigma$ limit on 24$\mu$m non-detections, the number of silicate-absorbed ULIRG candidates is 36. This defines a strong upper limit of $\sim$920 sources deg$^{-2}$, on the population of silicate-absorbed ULIRGs at z $\sim$ 1--1.8. This source count is about half of the total number of sources predicted at z $\sim$ 1--2 by various phenomenological models. We note that the high 16/24$\mu$m colors measured cannot be reproduced by any of the mid-IR spectral energy distributions assumed by these models, which points to the strong limitations currently affecting our phenomenological and theoretical understanding of infrared galaxy evolution.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Identifying silicate-absorbed ULIRGs at z~1-2 in the Bootes Field using Spitzer/IRS does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Identifying silicate-absorbed ULIRGs at z~1-2 in the Bootes Field using Spitzer/IRS, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Identifying silicate-absorbed ULIRGs at z~1-2 in the Bootes Field using Spitzer/IRS will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-487114

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.