Quasar-galaxy associations revisited

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

9 pages, 6 figures, MNRAS accepted

Scientific paper

10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.03936.x

Gravitational lensing predicts an enhancement of the density of bright, distant QSOs around foreground galaxies. We measure this QSO-galaxy correlation w_qg for two complete samples of radio-loud quasars, the southern 1Jy and Half-Jansky samples. The existence of a positive correlation between z~1 quasars and z~0.15 galaxies is confirmed at a p=99.0% significance level (>99.9%) if previous measurements on the northern hemisphere are included). A comparison with the results obtained for incomplete quasar catalogs (e.g. the Veron-Cetty and Veron compilation) suggests the existence of an `identification bias', which spuriously increases the estimated amplitude of the quasar-galaxy correlation for incomplete samples. This effect may explain many of the surprisingly strong quasar-galaxy associations found in the literature. Nevertheless, the value of w_qg that we measure in our complete catalogs is still considerably higher than the predictions from weak lensing. We consider two effects which could help to explain this discrepancy: galactic dust extinction and strong lensing.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Quasar-galaxy associations revisited does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Quasar-galaxy associations revisited, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Quasar-galaxy associations revisited will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-433341

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.