What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity?

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

26 pages, 3 figures

Scientific paper

On his way to General Relativity (GR) Einstein gave several arguments as to why a special relativistic theory of gravity based on a massless scalar field could be ruled out merely on grounds of theoretical considerations. We re-investigate his two main arguments, which relate to energy conservation and some form of the principle of the universality of free fall. We find that such a theory-based a priori abandonment not to be justified. Rather, the theory seems formally perfectly viable, though in clear contradiction with (later) experiments. This may be of interest to those who teach GR and/or have an active interest in its history.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What is (not) wrong with scalar gravity? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-419915

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.