Remarks on the "New Redshift Interpretation"

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

11 pages, LaTeX, no figures; new title and minor changes

Scientific paper

10.1142/S0217732399000109

In a recent article in {\em Modern Physics Letters} {\bf A}, Gentry proposed a new static cosmological model that seeks to explain the Hubble relation as a combination of gravitational and Doppler red shifts. We show that Gentry's model, although supposedly based on general relativity, is inconsistent with the Einstein field equations; that it requires delicate fine tuning of initial conditions; that it is highly unstable, both gravitationally and thermodynamically; and that its predictions disagree clearly with observation.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Remarks on the "New Redshift Interpretation" does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Remarks on the "New Redshift Interpretation", we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Remarks on the "New Redshift Interpretation" will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-393736

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.