Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2006-11-30
Mon.Not.Roy.Astron.Soc.375:1280-1290,2007
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
12 pages, 5 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS
Scientific paper
10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11363.x
We investigate the uncertainty in surface abundances and yields of asymptotic giant branch (AGB) stars. We apply three different mass loss laws to a 1.5 solar mass star of metallicity Z=0.008 at the beginning of the thermally pulsing asymptotic giant branch (TP-AGB) phase. Efficient third dredge-up is found even at very low envelope mass, contrary to previous simulations with other evolution codes. We find that the yield of carbon is uncertain by about 15% and for most other light elements the yield is uncertain at the level of 20-80%. For iron group elements the uncertainty varies from around 30% for the more abundant species to over a factor of two for the less abundant radioactive species, like iron-60. The post-AGB surface abundances for this mass and metallicity are much more uncertain due to the dilution of dredged-up material in differing envelope masses in the later stages of the models. Our results are compared to known planetary nebula (PN) and post-AGB abundances. We find that the models are mostly consistent with observations but we are unable to reproduce observations of some of the isotopes.
Jeffery Simon C.
Stancliffe Richard J.
No associations
LandOfFree
Mass loss and yield uncertainty in low-mass asymptotic giant branch stars does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Mass loss and yield uncertainty in low-mass asymptotic giant branch stars, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Mass loss and yield uncertainty in low-mass asymptotic giant branch stars will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-390900