MACHOs in M31? Absence of evidence but not evidence of absence

Details MACHOs in M31? Absence of evidence but not evidence of absence MACHOs in M31? Absence of evidence but not evidence of absence

2005-07-12

arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0507286v3

Astron.Astrophys. 446 (2006) 855-875

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

38 pages, 48 figures, high-resolution pdf available at http://www.astro.columbia.edu/~arlin/astro-ph/0507286.pdf, several text

Scientific paper

10.1051/0004-6361:20053812

We present results of a microlensing survey toward the Andromeda Galaxy (M31) carried out during four observing seasons at the Isaac Newton Telescope (INT). This survey is part of the larger microlensing survey toward M31 performed by the Microlensing Exploration of the Galaxy and Andromeda (MEGA) collaboration. Using a fully automated search algorithm, we indentify 14 candidate microlensing events, three of which are reported here for the first time. Observations obtained at the Mayall telescope are combined with the INT data to produce composite lightcurves for these candidates. The results from the survey are compared with theoretical predictions for the number and distribution of events. These predictions are based on a Monte Carlo calculation of the detection efficiency and disk-bulge-halo models for M31. The models provide the full phase-space distribution functions for the lens and source populations and are motivated by dynamical and observational considerations. They include differential extinction and span a wide range of parameter space characterised primarily by the mass-to-light ratios for the disk and bulge. For most models, the observed event rate is consistent with the rate predicted for self-lensing -- a MACHO halo fraction of 30% or higher can be ruled at the 95% confidence level. The event distribution does show a large near-far asymmetry hinting at a halo contribution to the microlensing signal. Two candidate events are located at particularly large projected radii on the far side of the disk. These events are difficult to explain by self lensing and only somewhat easier to explain by MACHO lensing. A possibility is that one of these is due to a lens in a giant stellar stream.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

MACHOs in M31? Absence of evidence but not evidence of absence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with MACHOs in M31? Absence of evidence but not evidence of absence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and MACHOs in M31? Absence of evidence but not evidence of absence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-371558