Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2000-09-15
Phys.Lett.B498:67-73,2001
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
Version to appear in PLB
Scientific paper
10.1016/S0370-2693(00)01368-X
We consider the efficacy of using luminosity distance measurements of deep redshift supernovae to discriminate between two forms of dark energy, quintessence (a scalar field with canonical kinetic terms rolling down a potential) and k-essence (a scalar field whose cosmic evolution is driven entirely by non-linear kinetic terms). The primary phenomenological distinction between the two types of models that can be quantified by supernova searches (at least in principle) is that the equation of state $w\equiv p/\rho$ of quintessence is falling today while that of k-essence is rising. By simulating $10^5$ possible datasets that SNAP could obtain, we show that even if the mass density $\Omega_m$ is known exactly, an ambiguity remains that may not allow a definitive distinction to be made between the two types of theories.
Barger Vernon
Marfatia Danny
No associations
LandOfFree
Supernova data may be unable to distinguish between quintessence and k-essence does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Supernova data may be unable to distinguish between quintessence and k-essence, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Supernova data may be unable to distinguish between quintessence and k-essence will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-371476