Dusty MgII Absorbers: Implications for the GRB/Quasar Incidence Discrepancy

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Cosmology and Extragalactic Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

11 pages (including 4 figures). ApJ Accepted Revision: Corrected author list

Scientific paper

There is nearly a factor of four difference in the number density of intervening MgII absorbers as determined from gamma-ray burst (GRB) and quasar lines of sight. We use a Monte-Carlo simulation to test if a dust extinction bias can account for this discrepancy. We apply an empirically determined relationship between dust column density and MgII rest equivalent width to simulated quasar sight-lines and model the underlying number of quasars that must be present to explain the published magnitude distribution of SDSS quasars. We find that an input MgII number density dn/dz of 0.273 +- 0.002 over the range 0.4 <= z <= 2.0 and with MgII equivalent width W_0 >= 1.0 angstroms accurately reproduces observed distributions. From this value, we conclude that a dust obstruction bias cannot be the sole cause of the observed discrepancy between GRB and quasar sight-lines: this bias is likely to reduce the discrepancy only by ~10%.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Dusty MgII Absorbers: Implications for the GRB/Quasar Incidence Discrepancy does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Dusty MgII Absorbers: Implications for the GRB/Quasar Incidence Discrepancy, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dusty MgII Absorbers: Implications for the GRB/Quasar Incidence Discrepancy will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-371406

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.