An upper limit to the masses of stars

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

To appear in Nature, March 10, 2005, Vol. 34, No. 7030, 192 (ST ScI Eprint #1645). More files can be found at http://www.stsci

Scientific paper

10.1038/nature03293

There is no accepted upper mass limit for stars. Such a basic quantity escapes both theory, because of incomplete understanding of star formation, and observation, because of incompleteness in surveying the Galaxy. The Arches cluster is ideal for such a test, being massive enough to expect stars at least as massive as 400 solar masses, and young enough for its most massive members to still be visible. It is old enough to be free of its natal molecular cloud, and close enough, and at a well-established distance, for us to discern its individual stars. Here I report an absence of stars with initial masses greater than 130 M_Sun in the Arches cluster, where the typical mass function predicts 18. I conclude that this indicates a firm limit of 150 M_Sun for stars as the probability that the observations are consistent with no limit is 10^-8.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

An upper limit to the masses of stars does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with An upper limit to the masses of stars, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and An upper limit to the masses of stars will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-370008

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.