Monte Carlo algorithms for model assessment via conflicting summaries

Statistics – Methodology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Under review

Scientific paper

The development of statistical methods and numerical algorithms for model choice is vital to many real-world applications. In practice, the ABC approach can be instrumental for sequential model design; however, the theoretical basis of its use has been questioned. We present a measure-theoretic framework for using the ABC error towards model choice and describe how easily existing rejection, Metropolis-Hastings and sequential importance sampling ABC algorithms are extended for the purpose of model checking. Considering a panel of applications from evolutionary biology to dynamic systems, we discuss the choice of summaries which differs from standard ABC approaches. The methods and algorithms presented here may provide the workhorse machinery for an exploratory approach to ABC model choice, particularly as the application of standard Bayesian tools can prove impossible.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Monte Carlo algorithms for model assessment via conflicting summaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Monte Carlo algorithms for model assessment via conflicting summaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Monte Carlo algorithms for model assessment via conflicting summaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-359275

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.