Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
1999-07-07
Astron.Rep. 43 (1999) 797; Astron.Zh. 76 (1999) 905
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
LaTeX, 18 pages, 11 eps-figures, Astron. Reports, in press
Scientific paper
We present the results of systematic comparison of 2D and 3D numerical models of mass transfer in semidetached binaries. It is shown that only for case of \gamma \sim 1 (near-isothermal case) the obtained 2D and 3D solutions are qualitatively similar. For higher value of \gamma the 3D flow structure is drastically changed and for \gamma=1.2 the accretion disk is not formed in the system. Numerical results show that for case of \gamma=1.2 the 2D and 3D solutions are different. We discuss the spiral-shaped shock waves obtained in numerical models. It is shown that these shocks are not intrinsic spirals and are caused by collisions of the gaseous flows in the system.
Bisikalo Dimitry V.
Boyarchuk Alexander A.
Chechetkin V. M.
Kuznetsov Oleg A.
Molteni Diego
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of 2D and 3D models of flow structure in semidetached binaries does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of 2D and 3D models of flow structure in semidetached binaries, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of 2D and 3D models of flow structure in semidetached binaries will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-357476