Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle

Details Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle

1998-08-05

arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9808016v2

Phys.Rev.Lett. 81 (1998) 1982

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

4 pages, TeX with harvmac; typo fixed. To appear in Phys. Rev. Lett

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.1982

It was pointed out recently [A. Kent, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 2874] that the consistent histories approach allows contrary inferences to be made from the same data. These inferences correspond to projections $P$ and $Q$, belonging to different consistent sets, with the properties that $PQ = QP = 0$ and $P \neq 1 -Q$. To many, this seems undesirable in a theory of physical inferences. It also raises a specific problem for the consistent histories formalism, since that formalism is set up so as to eliminate contradictory inferences, i.e. inferences $P$ and $Q$ where $P = 1 - Q$. Yet there seems to be no sensible physical distinction between contradictory and contrary inferences. It seems particularly hard to defend the asymmetry, since (i) there is a well-defined quantum histories formalisms which admits both contradictory and contrary inferences, and (ii) there is also a well-defined formalism, based on ordered consistent sets of histories, which excludes both. In a recent comment, Griffiths and Hartle, while accepting the validity of the examples given in the above paper, restate their own preference for the consistent histories formalism. As this brief reply explains, in so doing, they fail to address the arguments made against their approach to quantum theory.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Consistent Sets and Contrary Inferences: Reply to Griffiths and Hartle will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-347697