Global cluster morphology and its evolution: X-ray data vs CDM, LCDM and mixed models

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

29 pages (LaTeX,macros included), 9 figure.ps & 3 tables included. To appear on New Astronomy

Scientific paper

10.1016/S1384-1076(99)00005-6

The global structure of galaxy clusters and its evolution are tested within a large set of TREESPH simulations, so to allow a fair statistical comparison with available X-ray data. Structure tests are based on the "power ratios", introduced by Buote & Tsai. Cosmological models considered are CDM, LCDM (Omega_L=0.7) and CHDM (1 mass.neu., Omega_h = 0.2). All models are normalized to provide a fair number density of clusters. For each model we run a P3M simulation in a large box, where we select the most massive 40 clusters. Going back to the initial redshift we run a hydro-TREESPH simulation for each of them. In this way we perform a statistical comparison of the global morphology of clusters, for each cosmological model, with ROSAT data, using Student t-test, F-test and K-S test. The last test and its generalization to 2--D distributions are also used to compare the joint distributions of 2 or 3 power ratios. We find that, using DM distribution, instead of gas, as done by some authors, leads to biased results, as baryons are distributed in a less structured way than DM. We also find that the cosmological models considered have different behaviours in these tests: LCDM has the worst performance. CDM and our CHDM have similar scores. The general trend of power ratio distributions is already fit by these models, but a further improvement is expected either from a different DM mix or a non-flat CDM model.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Global cluster morphology and its evolution: X-ray data vs CDM, LCDM and mixed models does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Global cluster morphology and its evolution: X-ray data vs CDM, LCDM and mixed models, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Global cluster morphology and its evolution: X-ray data vs CDM, LCDM and mixed models will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-340808

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.