Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics
Scientific paper
2002-12-19
Astrophys.J. 588 (2003) 945-951
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astrophysics
25 pages, 10 figures. To appear in Ap.J, 588 (May 10, '03). Revisions correct FREGATE sensitivity and add a low energy GBM tri
Scientific paper
10.1086/374242
Gamma-ray burst detectors are sensitive at different energies, complicating the comparison of the burst populations that they detect. The instrument teams often report their detector sensitivities in their instruments' energy band. I propose that sensitivities be reported as the threshold peak photon flux F_T over the 1-1000 keV energy band for a specific spectral shape. The primary spectral parameter is E_p, the energy of the maximum E^2 N_E propto nu f_nu. Thus F_T vs. E_p is a useful description of a detector's sensitivity. I find that Swift will be marginally more sensitive than BATSE for E_p>100 keV, but significantly more sensitive for E_p<100 keV. Because of its low energy sensitivity, the FREGATE on HETE-2 is surprisingly sensitive below E_p=100 keV. Both the WFC on BeppoSAX and the WXM on HETE-2 are/were sensitive for low E_p. As expected, the GBM on GLAST will be less sensitive than BATSE, while EXIST will be significantly more sensitive than Swift. The BeppoSAX GRBM was less sensitive that the WFC, particularly at low E_p.
No associations
LandOfFree
Comparison of the Gamma-Ray Burst Sensitivity of Different Detectors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Comparison of the Gamma-Ray Burst Sensitivity of Different Detectors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparison of the Gamma-Ray Burst Sensitivity of Different Detectors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-329878