Partially-erupting prominences: a comparison between observations and model-predicted observables

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics – Solar and Stellar Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

13 pages, 11 figures

Scientific paper

10.1051/0004-6361/200809801

AIM: To investigate several partially-erupting prominences to study their relationship with other CME-associated phenomena and to compare these observations with observables predicted by a model of partially-expelled flux ropes (Gibson & Fan, 2006a, b). METHODS: We have studied 6 selected events with partially-erupting prominences using multi wavelength observations recorded by the Extreme-ultraviolet Imaging Telescope (EIT), Transition Region and Coronal Explorer (TRACE), Mauna Loa Solar Observatory (MLSO), Big Bear Solar Observatory (BBSO) and soft X-ray telescope (SXT). The observational features associated with partially-erupting prominences were then compared with the predicted observables from the model. RESULTS: The partially-expelled-flux-rope (PEFR) model of Gibson & Fan (2006a, b) can explain the partial eruption of these prominences, and in addition predicts a variety of other CME-related observables that provide evidence for internal reconnection during eruption. We find that all of the partially-erupting prominences studied in this paper exhibit indirect evidence for internal reconnection. Moreover, all cases showed evidence of at least one observable unique to the PEFR model, e.g., dimmings external to the source region, and/or a soft X-ray cusp overlying a reformed sigmoid. CONCLUSIONS: The PEFR model provides a plausible mechanism to explain the observed evolution of partially-erupting-prominence-associated CMEs in our study.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Partially-erupting prominences: a comparison between observations and model-predicted observables does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Partially-erupting prominences: a comparison between observations and model-predicted observables, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Partially-erupting prominences: a comparison between observations and model-predicted observables will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-312016

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.