A Note on Zipf's Law, Natural Languages, and Noncoding DNA regions

Computer Science – Computation and Language

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

compressed uuencoded postscript file: 14 pages

Scientific paper

In Phys. Rev. Letters (73:2, 5 Dec. 94), Mantegna et al. conclude on the basis of Zipf rank frequency data that noncoding DNA sequence regions are more like natural languages than coding regions. We argue on the contrary that an empirical fit to Zipf's ``law'' cannot be used as a criterion for similarity to natural languages. Although DNA is a presumably an ``organized system of signs'' in Mandelbrot's (1961) sense, an observation of statistical features of the sort presented in the Mantegna et al. paper does not shed light on the similarity between DNA's ``grammar'' and natural language grammars, just as the observation of exact Zipf-like behavior cannot distinguish between the underlying processes of tossing an $M$ sided die or a finite-state branching process.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

A Note on Zipf's Law, Natural Languages, and Noncoding DNA regions does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with A Note on Zipf's Law, Natural Languages, and Noncoding DNA regions, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and A Note on Zipf's Law, Natural Languages, and Noncoding DNA regions will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-296609

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.