Reinterpreting the Pioneer anomaly and its annual residual

Details Reinterpreting the Pioneer anomaly and its annual residual Reinterpreting the Pioneer anomaly and its annual residual

2005-05-16

arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/0505077v2

Astronomy and Astrophysics

Astrophysics

General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology

21 pages, no figures. Corrected typos

Scientific paper

In addition to its long-term constancy, the Pioneer (spacecraft) anomaly appears to only exist for bodies whose mass is less than that of: planets, moons, comets, and heavy asteroids of known mass. Assuming the observational evidence is reliable, and not the result of an unknown systematic effect, a violation of the Weak Principle of Equivalence is implied. To propose an additional force fails to satisfy this constraint. This paper presents a new hypothesis involving additional field energy in the form of: a finite number of lunar sourced constant amplitude (Lorentz invariant) wave-like undulations upon the gravitational field. Although apparently a futile suggestion, the author's model overcomes concerns regarding wave dissipation, wave generation, and the apparent constancy of the anomaly. A shortfall in motion arises because a tiny proportion of spacecraft kinetic energy is directed into a superposition of non-translational longitudinal oscillatory components. The restriction of this effect to low mass bodies is also addressed. Additionally, the annual residual of the Pioneer anomaly may be attributed to a real 356 day Callisto-Titan wave resonance. This hypothesis may also be readily applied to other solar system anomalies including: the Earth flyby anomaly, an apparent absence of small comets, an apparent paucity of smaller bodies in the Main Belt of asteroids, and residual doubts concerning the migrating planets hypothesis that addresses the too rapid formation of the ice giants Uranus and Neptune.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

No associations

Rating

Reinterpreting the Pioneer anomaly and its annual residual does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Reinterpreting the Pioneer anomaly and its annual residual, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Reinterpreting the Pioneer anomaly and its annual residual will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-270845