The Residual Information Criterion, Corrected

Statistics – Methodology

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

6 pages

Scientific paper

Shi and Tsai (JRSSB, 2002) proposed an interesting residual information criterion (RIC) for model selection in regression. Their RIC was motivated by the principle of minimizing the Kullback-Leibler discrepancy between the residual likelihoods of the true and candidate model. We show, however, under this principle, RIC would always choose the full (saturated) model. The residual likelihood therefore, is not appropriate as a discrepancy measure in defining information criterion. We explain why it is so and provide a corrected residual information criterion as a remedy.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The Residual Information Criterion, Corrected does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The Residual Information Criterion, Corrected, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The Residual Information Criterion, Corrected will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-270256

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.