Separation of Test-Free Propositional Dynamic Logics over Context-Free Languages

Computer Science – Logic in Computer Science

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

In Proceedings GandALF 2011, arXiv:1106.0814

Scientific paper

10.4204/EPTCS.54.15

For a class L of languages let PDL[L] be an extension of Propositional Dynamic Logic which allows programs to be in a language of L rather than just to be regular. If L contains a non-regular language, PDL[L] can express non-regular properties, in contrast to pure PDL. For regular, visibly pushdown and deterministic context-free languages, the separation of the respective PDLs can be proven by automata-theoretic techniques. However, these techniques introduce non-determinism on the automata side. As non-determinism is also the difference between DCFL and CFL, these techniques seem to be inappropriate to separate PDL[DCFL] from PDL[CFL]. Nevertheless, this separation is shown but for programs without test operators.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Separation of Test-Free Propositional Dynamic Logics over Context-Free Languages does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Separation of Test-Free Propositional Dynamic Logics over Context-Free Languages, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Separation of Test-Free Propositional Dynamic Logics over Context-Free Languages will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-26176

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.