Stellar Yields and Chemical Evolution

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages, 4 figures, LaTeX, also available at http://msowww.anu.edu.au/~gibson/publications.html To appear in "Cosmic Chemica

Scientific paper

Several speakers at IAU Symposium #187 (Cosmic Chemical Evolution) alluded to the zeroth-order agreement between Type II supernovae (SNe) stellar yield compilations, as predicted by the models of those most responsible for driving progress in the field - i.e., Arnett (1991,1996); Maeder (1992); Woosley & Weaver (1995); Langer & Henkel (1995); Thielemann et al. (1996). It is important though for those entering (or indeed, already involved in!) the chemical evolution field to be cognizant of the fact that there are important first- and second-order differences between these compilations. In the next few pages, I provide a qualitative comparison of the currently available Type II SNe yield grids. The strengths and weaknesses of a given grid, demonstrated by comparing against relevant observations, are noted. Some simple chemical evolution models are shown which graphically demonstrate the effect of yield grid selection.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Stellar Yields and Chemical Evolution does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Stellar Yields and Chemical Evolution, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Stellar Yields and Chemical Evolution will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-255629

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.