Likelihood Analysis of Repeating in the BATSE Catalogue

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

5 pages including 3 encapsulated figures, as a uuencoded, gzipped, Postscript file. To appear in Proc. of the 1995 La Jolla wo

Scientific paper

10.1007/BF00658584

I describe a new likelihood technique, based on counts-in-cells statistics, that I use to analyze repeating in the BATSE 1B and 2B catalogues. Using the 1B data, I find that repeating is preferred over non-repeating by 4.3:1 odds, with a well-defined peak at 5-6 repetitions per source. I find that the post-1B data are consistent with the repeating model inferred from the 1B data, after taking into account the lower fraction of bursts with well-determined positions. Combining the two data sets, I find that the odds favoring repeating over non-repeating are almost unaffected at 4:1, with a narrower peak at 5 repetitions per source. I conclude that the data sets are consistent both with each other and with repeating, and that for these data sets the odds favor repeating.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Likelihood Analysis of Repeating in the BATSE Catalogue does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Likelihood Analysis of Repeating in the BATSE Catalogue, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Likelihood Analysis of Repeating in the BATSE Catalogue will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-219307

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.