What are MACHOs? Interpreting LMC microlensing

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

8 pages, no figures, To appear in ``Microlensing 2000: A New Era of Microlensing Astrophysics,'' an ASP conference proceedings

Scientific paper

I discuss two hypotheses that might explain LMC microlensing: the Halo stellar remnant lensing hypothesis and the unvirialized LMC lensing hypothesis. I show that white dwarfs cannot contribute substantially to the cosmic baryon budget; they are strongly constrained by chemical evolution and background light measurements. Although there have been some claims of direct optical detections of white dwarfs in the Halo, I show how the full sample of direct optical searches for halo lenses do not support the Halo lens hypothesis. N-body simulations suggest that the LMC may be naturally excited out of virial equilibrium by tidal forcing from the Milky Way. New measurements of LMC kinematics not only do not rule out the unvirialized LMC lensing hypothesis, but even moderately favor it (at 95% confidence).

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

What are MACHOs? Interpreting LMC microlensing does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with What are MACHOs? Interpreting LMC microlensing, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and What are MACHOs? Interpreting LMC microlensing will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-200537

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.