An observational case against nova hibernation

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

29

Cataclysmic Variables, Novae, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Stellar Evolution, Stellar Luminosity, Stellar Spectra, White Dwarf Stars

Scientific paper

We use WHT spectroscopy and imaging to show that nova Vul 1670 (= CK Vul) has been incorrectly identified, and thus its luminosity cannot be used as evidence that novae fade into a 'hibernation' phase within 300 yr of their outbursts. INT spectroscopy is used to correct the magnitude of nova Sge 1783 (= WY Sge) for inclination, this result also implying that novae do not fade significantly. We therefore suggest that, while novae decline in the first 60 yr after outburst, thereafter their luminosity remains constant, and they never undergo a 'hibernation' phase. We show that this idea is consistent with the space density of novae and novalike variables, the outburst interval of SS Cyg and the current luminosities of old novae.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

An observational case against nova hibernation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with An observational case against nova hibernation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and An observational case against nova hibernation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1870672

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.