Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Oct 1992
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1992mnras.258..449n&link_type=abstract
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (ISSN 0035-8711), vol. 258, no. 3, p. 449-456.
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
29
Cataclysmic Variables, Novae, Astronomical Spectroscopy, Stellar Evolution, Stellar Luminosity, Stellar Spectra, White Dwarf Stars
Scientific paper
We use WHT spectroscopy and imaging to show that nova Vul 1670 (= CK Vul) has been incorrectly identified, and thus its luminosity cannot be used as evidence that novae fade into a 'hibernation' phase within 300 yr of their outbursts. INT spectroscopy is used to correct the magnitude of nova Sge 1783 (= WY Sge) for inclination, this result also implying that novae do not fade significantly. We therefore suggest that, while novae decline in the first 60 yr after outburst, thereafter their luminosity remains constant, and they never undergo a 'hibernation' phase. We show that this idea is consistent with the space density of novae and novalike variables, the outburst interval of SS Cyg and the current luminosities of old novae.
Charles Phil A.
Evans Aaron
Mukai Kazuhiko
Naylor Tim
No associations
LandOfFree
An observational case against nova hibernation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with An observational case against nova hibernation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and An observational case against nova hibernation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1870672