Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Mar 1997
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1997apj...478..367m&link_type=abstract
Astrophysical Journal v.478, p.367
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
29
Stars: Binaries: Spectroscopic, Stars: Planetary Systems
Scientific paper
Spectroscopic orbits have been reported for six unseen companions orbiting solar-type stars with minimum possible masses in the range 0.5--10 Jupiter masses. The four least massive companions, around 51 Peg, 47 UMa, 55 Cnc, and tau Boo, have nearly circular orbits, while the two most massive companions, around HD 114762 and 70 Vir, have eccentricities of 0.35 and 0.40. We compare the orbital eccentricities of these six planet candidates with the eccentricities of the planets in the solar system, of the three planets found around the pulsar PSR B1957+12, and of the low-mass secondaries in a subsample of the spectroscopic binaries from the Carney-Latham proper-motion survey. The distribution of eccentricities for the combined samples displays a striking pattern: the companions with masses smaller than about 5 Jupiter masses have circular orbits, while the more massive companions have eccentric orbits. We outline four possible scenarios that might have produced this pattern of eccentricity versus mass.
Latham David W.
Mayor Michel
Mazeh Tsevi
No associations
LandOfFree
Eccentricity versus Mass for Low-Mass Secondaries and Planets does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Eccentricity versus Mass for Low-Mass Secondaries and Planets, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Eccentricity versus Mass for Low-Mass Secondaries and Planets will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1859070