Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Jun 1989
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1989jgr....94.6949n&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 94, June 1, 1989, p. 6949-6953.
Mathematics
Logic
77
Atmospheric Boundary Layer, Dmsp Satellites, Geomagnetism, Solar Wind, Attitude (Inclination), Cusps, Noaa Satellites, Polar Caps, Solstices, Tropical Regions
Scientific paper
A large data set of approximately 12,000 Defense Meteorological Satellite Program satellite F7 crossings of the cusp or the cleft (i.e., the dayside magnetospheric boundary layer) over a 3-year period is studied for seasonal dependence in latitudinal position. A carefully tested algorithm is used to distinguish the various dayside particle precipitation regions and boundaries. It is found that in the 1100-1300 MLT sector, the cusp proper exhibits about -0.06 deg magnetic latitude shift for each degree increase in dipole tilt angle. Thus, the difference between the average summer and winter cusp positions is close to 4 deg magnetic latitude, approximately symmetric about equinox. For the cleft (magnetospheric boundary layer), the variation is smaller.
Meng Ching I.
Newell Patrick T.
No associations
LandOfFree
Dipole tilt angle effects on the latitude of the cusp and cleft/low-latitude boundary layer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Dipole tilt angle effects on the latitude of the cusp and cleft/low-latitude boundary layer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Dipole tilt angle effects on the latitude of the cusp and cleft/low-latitude boundary layer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1855535