Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Jun 1989
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1989icar...79..382f&link_type=abstract
Icarus, Volume 79, Issue 2, p. 382-395.
Mathematics
Logic
6
Scientific paper
The belief that mass extinctions of species on Earth have occurred on a ~26- to 33-my cycle is supported by some rather equivocal geological evidence. This has prompted a search for cosmic phenomena that could subject the Earth at regular intervals to bombardment by showers of comets, with resulting damage to the biosphere. A crucial assumption that an impact-driven mass extinction cycle would automatically show up in the geological record is questioned. Might the background flux of random impacts distort the cycle and render it unrecognizable? Computer simulation of the impact bombardment of the Earth over a 250-my period, in which the background impact flux is overlaid by a 26-my comet shower cycle, showed a periodicity in the mass extinction data between 24 and 33 my in ~40-60% of runs, dependent on the magnitude of the background flux chosen, and only ~20-40% indicated the ``true'' 26-my periodicity. Thus, background impact ``noise'' can beidentified as an additional constraint on cyclic impact/mass extinction hypotheses.
Current address: 44 Hogarth Court, Fountain Drive, London SE19 1UY, United Kingdom.
No associations
LandOfFree
The relevance of the background impact flux to cyclic impact/mass extinction hypotheses does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The relevance of the background impact flux to cyclic impact/mass extinction hypotheses, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The relevance of the background impact flux to cyclic impact/mass extinction hypotheses will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1855153