Other
Scientific paper
May 1993
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993e%26psl.117...15w&link_type=abstract
Earth and Planetary Science Letters (ISSN 0012-821X), vol. 117, no. 1-2, p. 15-28.
Other
40
Geocentric Coordinates, Paleomagnetism, Polar Wandering (Geology), Geomagnetism, Latitude, Magnetic Poles
Scientific paper
Low paleolatitudes are very frequent in Eocene to Oligocene formations, particularly in the Tethyan mobile belt. These anomalies and their possible sources are discussed. They are neither due to unreliable results nor to inclination errors in sedimentary rocks. Neither can large tectonic movements explain these discrepancies. The most probable causes having been rejected, therefore, the best explanation consists in an alternative magnetic pole position for Eurasia located at 69 deg N, 215 deg E. It is proposed that the mean magnetic field of the Earth was dipolar, but that its axis has swung from one stable position to another during the middle Tertiary and was therefore sometimes different from the rotation axis.
No associations
LandOfFree
Did a large departure from the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis occur during the Eocene? Evidence from the magnetic polar wander path of Eurasia does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Did a large departure from the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis occur during the Eocene? Evidence from the magnetic polar wander path of Eurasia, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Did a large departure from the geocentric axial dipole hypothesis occur during the Eocene? Evidence from the magnetic polar wander path of Eurasia will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1853189