Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Apr 1935
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1935natur.135..658b&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 135, Issue 3417, pp. 658-659 (1935).
Mathematics
Logic
Scientific paper
WITH regard to the new biography of Isaac Newton by Prof. More and to the review in NATURE of January 5 (p. 3), the following considerations may be of interest. Brought up in a family devoted to the Royalist cause, Newton became a staunch Whig. As a fellow of Trinity College he is said to have been influenced by the Platonists, but in spite of this, Newton became a man of science who is far from Henry More's mystical Paracelsic ideas. We must ask how this astonishing development took place, even if we suppose that Newton's genius was essentially responsible for it. I believe that no biographer has yet pointed out the possibility of Spinoza's views having influenced Newton, for this great Dutch-Jewish philosopher was the only one among the philosophers of the seventeenth century who may be ranked with Newton. Oldenburg, secretary to the Royal Society, visited Spinoza at his residence at Rhynsburg in 1661 and was in correspondence with him from 1661 until 1665 and afterwards, 16757ndash;76, concerning scientific, philosophical and theological problems. It is known that Boyle was interested in Spinoza's view, and it is most probable that Newton too had some knowledge of Spinoza and his works. The ``Theological-Political Treatise'' (1670) greatly influenced English metaphysicians, for example, Locke. It might have influenced Newton's political and theological views as well.
No associations
LandOfFree
Newton and Spinoza does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Newton and Spinoza, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Newton and Spinoza will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1846312