The AMIGA project. Revised positions for CIG galaxies (Leon+ 2003)

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Positional Data, Galaxy Catalogs

Scientific paper

We present revised positions for the 1051 galaxies belonging to the Karachentseva Catalog of Isolated Galaxies (CIG, Cat. ). New positions were calculated by applying SExtractor to the Digitized Sky Survey CIG fields with a spatial resolution of 1.2". We visually checked the results and for 118 galaxies had to recompute the assigned positions due to complex morphologies (e.g. distorted isophotes, undefined nuclei, knotty galaxies) or the presence of bright stars. We found differences between older and newer positions of up to 38" with a mean value of 2.96" relative to SIMBAD and up to 38" and 2.42" respectively relative to UZC (Cat. ). Based on star positions from the APM catalog (Cat. ) we determined that the DSS astrometry of five CIG fields has a mean offset in (α,δ) of (-0.90", 0.93") with a dispersion of 0.4". These results have been confirmed using the 2MASS All-Sky Catalog of Point Sources (Cat. ). The intrinsic errors of our method combined with the astrometric ones are of the order of 0.5".
(2 data files).

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The AMIGA project. Revised positions for CIG galaxies (Leon+ 2003) does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The AMIGA project. Revised positions for CIG galaxies (Leon+ 2003), we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The AMIGA project. Revised positions for CIG galaxies (Leon+ 2003) will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1768712

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.