Other
Scientific paper
Mar 1971
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1971natur.230..234m&link_type=abstract
Nature, Volume 230, Issue 5291, pp. 234-235 (1971).
Other
Scientific paper
ANY plausible theory about the origin of the solar system must explain, among other known facts, the chemical fractionation of the planets. The terrestrial planets (of densities 3.9-5.5 g cm-3) are principally characterized by Fe, Mg, Si and oxygen, whereas some of the outer planets, of densities 0.7-1.6 g cm-3 and rich in hydrogen, helium and other volatiles, may have retained the elemental composition of the original solar nebula. Hoyle and Wickramasinghe1,2 have suggested that the planets were formed in a hot solar centrifuge3, and that whereas Jupiter and Saturn have the composition of the original solar nebula, the deficiency of hydrogen in Uranus and Neptune arises because the peripheral speed of hydrogen molecules is equal to the escape velocity from the solar system for these orbital distances. Further, the compositions of the more dense Fe-bearing inner planets may be caused essentially by thermal fractionation1-3, because refractory MgO, Fe and SiO2 of the principal elements and possible molecules condense first at ~ 1500 K. The composition of Pluto is crucial to the validity of the nebular centrifuge theory, since from its position in the solar system the theory demands that Pluto not be Fe-rich. Here I show that similarities in the spectra of Pluto and Fe-bearing terrestrial silicates indicate that Pluto may well be Fe-rich.
No associations
LandOfFree
Is Pluto an Iron-rich Planet? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Is Pluto an Iron-rich Planet?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Is Pluto an Iron-rich Planet? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1761322