Mathematics – Logic
Scientific paper
Dec 1988
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1988jgr....9314549n&link_type=abstract
Journal of Geophysical Research (ISSN 0148-0227), vol. 93, Dec. 1, 1988, p. 14549-14556.
Mathematics
Logic
249
Boundary Layer Plasmas, Magnetosheath, Particle Precipitation, Polar Cusps, Dmsp Satellites, Statistical Analysis
Scientific paper
The distinction between the cusp and the cleft was investigated on the basis of statistical and case study evidence, using one year of the DMSP F7 electron and ion data comprising 5609 individual dayside passes. It was found that a clear morphological distinction between the cusp proper and the cleft/low-latitude boundary layer (LLBL) could be made on the basis of the average energy of precipitating particles. The probability of observing the cusp was found to be highest at 1200 MLT, while the probability of observing the cleft/LLBL was near unity away from noon and was minimal at noon.
Meng Ching I.
Newell Patrick T.
No associations
LandOfFree
The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer - Low-altitude identification and statistical local time variation does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer - Low-altitude identification and statistical local time variation, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The cusp and the cleft/boundary layer - Low-altitude identification and statistical local time variation will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1758631