The tectonic and volcanic evolution of Venus: Catastrophic or gradual?

Other

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Geodynamics, Lithosphere, Planetary Craters, Planetary Crusts, Planetary Evolution, Planetary Geology, Plates (Tectonics), Subduction (Geology), Tectonics, Venus (Planet), Volcanoes, Volcanology, Canyons, Convective Heat Transfer, Magellan Project (Nasa), Mountains, Plateaus, Radar Imagery

Scientific paper

Radar imaging and altimetry data from the Magellan mission have yielded important new constraints on the tectonic and volcanic history of Venus and on its internal dynamics. The planet lacks global plate tectonics, but a number of chasm systems and corona moat structures have arcuate planforms, asymmetric topogrpahic profiles, and relief analogous to deep-sea trenches on Earth and may be products of limited lithospheric underthrusting or subduction. Several lines of evidence point to a crust and upper mantle stronger than would be predicted by simple extrapolation from Earth and the 450 K greater surface temperature; these include the unrelaxed depths of impact craters, apparently large values of elastic lithosphere thickness, and large ratios of gravity to topography. The density of impact craters indicates an average crater retention age of about 500 My, but not more than 5% of the recognized craters have been volcanically embayed. This last observation has led to the proposal that Venus has been subjected to one or more global resurfacing events, the latest about 500 My ago, and that the volcanic flux during intervals between such events has been low. That more recent tectonic activity has been widespread, however, is indicated by the high relief and slopes of mountains, chasm walls, and plateau margins; the significant fraction (0.3) of impact craters deformed by younger faults; and the postformational vertical deformation of long channels. Interior dynamical scenarios advanced to account for episodic volcanic resurfacing include catastrophic overturn of a global lithosphere thickened by cooling or compositional buoyancy and strongly time-dependent mantle convective heat flux. Outgassing considerations and analogy with Earth and other terrestrial planets, however, suggests that such catastrophic models are unlikely. If the mantle of Venus cooled more efficiently than that of Earth because of, say, different boundary conditions, a different flow law, or a different degree of layering, then the planet may in the last 500 My have attained lesser mantle temperatures, lower mantle heat flux, and a significantly lesser rate of magma production than Earth yet still display evidence for ongoing convection and active tectonics. Such a 'cold Venus' scenario would be broadly consistent with observations yet be characterized by a gradual volcanic and tectonic evolution.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

The tectonic and volcanic evolution of Venus: Catastrophic or gradual? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with The tectonic and volcanic evolution of Venus: Catastrophic or gradual?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and The tectonic and volcanic evolution of Venus: Catastrophic or gradual? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1708219

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.