Computer Science
Scientific paper
Mar 1993
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=1993ssrv...66..309v&link_type=abstract
Space Science Reviews, Volume 66, Issue 1-4, pp. 309-322
Computer Science
6
Scientific paper
Theoretically predicted evolutionary phases of massive close binaries are compared with the observations. For the evolution up to the High-Mass X-ray Binary (HMXB) phase there is fair agreement between theory and observation. Beyond the HMXB phase there is much uncertainty. Notably it is puzzling why we observe so few systems consisting of a helium star and a neutron star (Cygnus X-3 is the only one found so far), and why the incidence of double neutron stars is so low. A better understanding of Common Envelope evolution is required in order to answer these questions. The role of velocity kicks imparted to neutron stars during supernova collapse is discussed. Such kicks might cause many runaway OB stars to be single.
No associations
LandOfFree
Massive close binaries: Observational characteristics does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with Massive close binaries: Observational characteristics, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Massive close binaries: Observational characteristics will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1708027