Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astronomy
Scientific paper
Jan 2009
adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-data_query?bibcode=2009aas...21331802n&link_type=abstract
American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #213, #318.02; Bulletin of the American Astronomical Society, Vol. 41, p.296
Astronomy and Astrophysics
Astronomy
Scientific paper
We analyze the variability in accretion-related emission lines for 50 Classical T Tauri stars to probe the extent of accretion variations in young stellar objects. Our analysis is based on multi-epoch high-resolution spectra for young stars in Taurus and Chamaeleon I. For all stars, we obtain typically four spectra, covering timescales from hours to months. As accretion indicators, we use Hα 10% width and CaII- line flux, both known to be correlated with the accretion rate. While the two quantities are correlated, their variability is not. Converted to accretion rates, the CaII fluxes indicate typical accretion rate changes of 0.35dex, with 33% exceeding 0.5dex, while Hα 10% width variability correspond to changes of 0.78dex, with 65% exceeding 0.5dex. We conclude that CaII fluxes are a more robust quantitative indicator of accretion than Hα 10% width. Our results demonstrate that intrinsic accretion rate changes typically do not exceed 0.5dex on timescales of days to months. Thus, accretion rates in young stars are mostly stable. The maximum extent of the variability is reached after a few days, indicating that rotation may be the dominant cause of variability. We see a clear decline of the accretion indicators towards later spectral types, reflecting the Mdot vs. M relationship. There is a gap between accretors and non-accretors, pointing to a rapid shutdown of accretion and a `two timescale' disk evolution. We conclude that the 2 orders of magnitude scatter in the Mdot vs. M relationship is dominated by object-to-object scatter instead of intrinsic source variability. This favors scenarios where the appearance of the Mdot vs. mass plot is determined primarily by evolutionary stage, environmental factors such as disk parameters, or both. This work was supported in part by NSERC grants to RJ and MHvK and an Early Researcher Award from Ontario to RJ.
Brandeker Alexis
Jayawardhana Ray
Nguyen Duy Cuong
Scholz Aleks
van Kerkwijk Marten Henric
No associations
LandOfFree
How Variable is Accretion in Young Stars? does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.
If you have personal experience with How Variable is Accretion in Young Stars?, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and How Variable is Accretion in Young Stars? will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-1697721