Comparing WIMP Interaction Rate Detectors with Annual Modulation Detectors

Astronomy and Astrophysics – Astrophysics

Scientific paper

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

4 pages, 2 figures. Submitted to Phys. Rev. Letters

Scientific paper

10.1103/PhysRevD.67.103507

We compare the sensitivity of WIMP detection via direct separation of possible signal vs. background to WIMP detection via detection of an annual modulation, in which signal and background cannot be separated on an event-by-event basis. In order to determine how the constraints from the two different types of experiments might be combined an adequate incorporation of uncertainties due to galactic halo models must be made. This issue is particularly timely in light of recent direct detection limits from Edelweiss and CDMS, which we now demonstrate cannot be made consistent with a recent claimed DAMA annual modulation observation, even by including halo uncertainties. On the other hand, we demonstrate that a combination of these two techniques, in the event of any positive direct detection signal, could ultimately allow significant constraints on anisotropic halo models even without directional sensitivity in these detectors.

No associations

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for scientists and scientific papers. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Comparing WIMP Interaction Rate Detectors with Annual Modulation Detectors does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this scientific paper.

If you have personal experience with Comparing WIMP Interaction Rate Detectors with Annual Modulation Detectors, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparing WIMP Interaction Rate Detectors with Annual Modulation Detectors will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFWR-SCP-O-166424

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.